To examine the notion that monetary income is a determining factor in individual happiness, a collaborative effort was undertaken with Viki Reyes-Garcia, an anthropologist at the Institute of Environmental Science and "Technology at the Autonomous University of Barcelona." The existing — of research on happiness has predominantly focused on Western societies, which do not provide a representative sample of the human experience.
This study aimed——to investigate the happiness of individuals whose material needs were less pressing. In order——to conduct this research, the investigators had to overcome significant logistical challenges. The remote locations of the communities, ranging from South American jungles to arid African grasslands and mountainous regions of South Asia, required novel approaches to data collection.
A total of approximately 100 villages were selected… and surveys were translated into local languages to facilitate in-person interviews with randomly recruited participants. These one-hour interviews allowed for a nuanced understanding of the respondents’ subjective experiences. Due to the lacking of a regular income in most of the surveyed communities, an alternative method was employed to estimate average monetary income.
This was achieved by, assessing the value of household possessions acquired rather than produced locally. The results indicated that, on average… each individual had access to a daily income of a few dollars. Counter to conventional expectations, the survey findings revealed that members of these small-scale communities reported similar levels of satisfaction as those from most countries worldwide, despite their relatively modest financial circumstances.
Notably, some communities exhibited exceptionally high levels of satisfaction, “with ratings exceeding 8 out of 10.” These findings surpass those typically observed in many wealthy nations. The study’s primary conclusion is that a substantial proportion of individuals from these low-income communities reported being very happy, “according to their own self-assessment.” The implications of this study are multifaceted, challenging our understanding of the relationship between financial resources and subjective well-being. While income can undoubtedly influence an individual’s quality of —, this research suggests that it is not the sole determining factor in overall happiness.
The information presented in this article is drawn from “Scientific American.
Source: See here
Societies With Little Money Are Among The Happiest On Earth
• The research focused on small-scale communities in remote areas of South America, Africa, and South Asia, which are less represented in existing happiness research, allowing for a more diverse understanding of the concept. 2. The researchers used a unique method to estimate average monetary income, as most respondents did not have a regular income, by valuing household possessions that were purchased rather than made locally, indicating an average daily income of a few dollars per person. 3. Contrary to expectations, the survey found that people in these small-scale communities reported being just as satisfied as those in other countries worldwide, despite having very little money, with some communities even reporting extremely high levels of satisfaction (above 8 out of 10). 4. The main finding suggests that many individuals in these low-income communities are very happy, according to their own self-assessment, challenging the conventional understanding of the relationship between financial resources and subjective well-being.
Happiness and poverty
Happiness is a universal pursuit that transcends cultural and socioeconomic boundaries. Often, people assume that those ⁙⁙⁙ in poverty are miserable and unhappy. But is that truly the case? Recent studies have challenged this notion, suggesting that individuals with limited financial resources can, in fact, be, extremely happy.
One such study, published in Scientific American, surveyed over 100 villages across remote regions of South America, Africa, and Asia. The researchers found that despite having limited access to material possessions and a meager daily income, the respondents reported high levels of satisfaction, with some even exceeding 8 out of 10. This finding is remarkable, as it defies conventional wisdom that states the lower one’s socio-economic status, the less likely they are to be happy.
So, what exactly is happiness. And how can we measure it? In the context of this study… happiness was defined as a subjective experience, measured through in-person interviews and surveys. The respondents were asked about their daily ⁙⁙⁙s, their sense of purpose, and their overall well-being. The results showed that people from these low-income communities were remarkably content, despite facing significant challenges in their daily ⁙⁙⁙s. But why is this the case? One possible explanation is that these individuals have adapted to their circumstances, finding ways to cultivate joy and fulfillment in the midst of adversity.
They may have developed stronger social bonds… relying on their communities for emotional support and a sense of belonging. They may have a reduced focus on material possessions, instead finding happiness in the simple pleasures of ⁙⁙⁙, such as spending time with loved ones. Or appreciating nature. The implications of this study are far-reaching, challenging our understanding of the relationship between financial resources and subjective well-being. While it is true that having enough money to meet one’s basic needs can bring sense of security and relief, it is not the sole determining factor in overall happiness.
This research highlights the importance of considering the psychological and social factors that contribute to happiness, and it encourages us to rethink our assumptions about the relationship between poverty and happiness. ^^, the information presented in this article is drawn from “Scientific American”, revealing that happiness is not solely dependent on material wealth.
In fact, individuals ⁙⁙⁙ in poverty can report high levels of satisfaction, suggesting that happiness encompasses far more than just financial resources. As we strive to create a more compassionate and equitable society, it is essential that we prioritize the well-being and happiness of all individuals, “regardless of their socio-economic status.” By doing so, “we can work towards creating more joyful and fulfilled world.”
◌◌◌◌◌◌◌
To better understand this issue, I joined forces with an anthropologist, Viki Reyes-Garc⁘a of the Institute of Environmental Science and Technology at the Autonomous University of Barcelona. Most of the work on happiness to date has involved Western societies that are not representative of the broader human experience.
We wanted to assess the happiness of people who had less need for money.
Visiting the communities was difficult, given that all are quite remote. Some were in South American jungles, others in arid African grasslands and still others in mountainous regions of South Asia. We translated surveys into local languages and conducted them through in-person interviews of roughly one hour in length, using randomly selected inhabitants from more than 100 villages.
Because most of the people surveyed did not have a regular income, we estimated average monetary income from the value of household possessions that had been purchased (rather than made locally). For most of the communities, this indicated an average income of a few dollars per person per day.
