The concept of a “romantic type” or “romantic orientation” suggests that individuals have a habitual way of experiencing love, intimacy, and partnership. According to psychologist Travers Mark, this orientation shapes who we’re attracted to, how we express affection, and what we need to feel secure in a relationship (Mark, 2025). Mark’s work is rooted in the idea that romantic behavior is not random, but rather influenced by stable personality traits and attachment styles.
Research has shown that people differ not only in what they feel, but in how they organize emotional experience, particularly in romantic relationships (Bowlby, 1969). Mark’s science-inspired quiz aims to encourage reflection around the emotional logic that guides our romantic decision-making. The quiz is based on several recurring psychological dimensions, including attachment styles, emotional regulation, and intimacy needs.
These dimensions form a kind of internal blueprint for what love “should” feel like, which becomes familiar and self-reinforcing over time (Mark, 2025). This helps explain why two people can both want connection yet feel persistently mismatched. For instance, individuals with different attachment styles, such as anxious or avoidant attachment, may have different expectations and needs in a relationship (Mikulincer & Shaver, 200 ← →
What lies at the intersection of love, vulnerability, and the human psyche? The realm of romantic relationship personality types offers a fascinating glimpse into the complex dynamics that govern our interactions with others. According to research, individuals tend to exhibit distinct patterns of behavior in their romantic relationships, which can be broadly categorized into several personality types (Gilliland & Dunn, 2003). These types are shaped by a combination of factors, including attachment styles, emotional regulation, and interpersonal needs.
One such typology identifies individuals as either “secure,” “anxious,” or “avoidant” in their attachment styles (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007). Secure individuals tend to feel comfortable with intimacy, can regulate their emotions effectively, and maintain healthy relationships.
Anxious individuals, But then, often experience high levels of emotional distress, are overly dependent on their partners, and struggle with feelings of insecurity.
Avoidant individuals, by contrast, tend to shy away from intimacy, prioritize independence, and may come across as aloof or distant. Understanding these personality types can provide valuable insights into the ways in which we navigate romantic relationships.
Forbes notes that recognizing these patterns can help individuals better understand themselves and their partners, ultimately leading to more fulfilling and satisfying relationships (For ← →
○○○ ○ ○○○
Why do some people fall hard and fast, while others move more cautiously? Why do certain partners feel intoxicating at first, yet exhausting over …
Find other details related to this topic: See here
